Re: Namespaces and XML validation
At 03:13 PM 8/10/98 -0700, Lisa Rein wrote: >peter murray rust wrote: >> As I have often >> (probably boringly) said, I think my community is far more interested in >> semantic than syntactic validity. (Actually they probably don't care about >> either much...) >How can you possibly have one without the other? If your syntax is >bogus -- you won't get far with semantics. How can you? Don't want to put words in his mouth, or his keyboard, but I think Peter's point was that his community -- chemists -- don't give a hoot whether >start< or <start> are valid XML tags; all they care about is that (using this example) some provision is made for "starting." Peter himself seems to have a fine grasp of the interdependence between semantics and syntax. John E. Simpson | It's no disgrace t'be poor, simpson@p... | but it might as well be. | -- "Kin" Hubbard xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format