[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML errors and fatal errors.

• From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:58:13 -0400 (EDT)

[John Cowan]
> Of course.  A simple fix would be to add a sentence to clause 2.1,
> somewhat as follows: "It is a fatal error for a document not to
> match the production _document_."

2. Documents

A data object is an _XML document_ if it is well-formed, as defined in
this specification.

[...]

2.1 Well-Formed XML Documents 

A textual object is a well-formed XML document if:

1. Taken as a whole, it matches the production labeled _document_.

[...]

So, to my reading, if it doesn't match _document_, it isn't XML, and
is outside the scope of the spec.  The XML spec shouldn't dictate
error-handling behavior for non-XML objects; otherwise, future
browsers would be required not to process GIFs, Word documents, HTML,
etc.  That would be silly.

-Chris
-- 
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML errors and fatal errors.
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• References:
  • Re: XML errors and fatal errors.
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Quotes in PEReferences
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces and XML validation
• Previous by thread: Re: XML errors and fatal errors.
• Next by thread: Re: XML errors and fatal errors.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread