[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Attributes with Intent (and namespaces)

• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
• To: "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 20:22:35 +0900

james anderson wrote:
> 
> what is the advantage to leaving the articulation (URI x local) part open in
> this interface? why isn't the parameter an opaque object? i'm not sure what
> the application concern is, but, for the relations which occurred to me, there
> are better ways to do that than having to broaden all name-related interfaces.

The designer of a namespace merely provides a URI as well as element type 
names and attribute names.  They do not provide unique prefixes.  Prefixes 
within documents are merely local proxies.  It would be dead wrong for 
application programs to rely on prefixes.

Makoto
 
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
 
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Attributes with Intent (and namespaces)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Attributes with Intent (and namespaces)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)
• Previous by thread: Re: Attributes with Intent (and namespaces)
• Next by thread: Re: Attributes with Intent (and namespaces)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread