[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 08:33:40 -0400

Chris Hubick writes:

 > 	As far as my HXP parser goes, well, I plan on adding SAX 1
 > support as soon as I can, and had planned on namespace support
 > anyhow, so I welcome this simple addition.  Both of your proposals
 > require the parser writer to support Namespaces, and as for parsers
 > that don't - fix them :-)

Since XML 1.0 does not require namespace support, it is possible for
a parser to be XML-conformant without supporting namespaces -- in that
case, it would always set the URI part of the name to null.

This leads to another thought -- that we probably need some kind of a
hook for requesting and/or querying parser features.  This issue came
up before during the initial SAX 1.0 design.  Something like the
following might be appropriate:

  package org.xml.sax;

  public interface Parser {
    ...
    public boolean hasFeature (String featureName);
    public boolean requestFeature (String featureName, boolean status);
  }

It is important to note that with such an approach, there would have
to be a registry of feature names in addition to the SAX interface.

Here's how you could use this interface:

  if (!parser.requestFeature("org.xml.sax.validation", true) ||
      !parser.requestFeature("org.xml.sax.namespaces", false)) {
    throw new MyException("Cannot activate validation without namespaces.");
  }

The details remain to be worked out.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
    • From: Chris Hubick <maillist@c...>
  • Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• References:
  • SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
    • From: Chris Hubick <maillist@c...>

• Prev by Date: Analysing XLink
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces: prefixes vs. no prefixes
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: SAX: two alternatives for namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread