[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 2 (Namespaces)

• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>,xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:23:19

At 20:45 02/07/98 UT, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Here's another go, trying to make everyone happy and cover my butt for the 
>multiple interpretations I can derive from the current draft.  I took James 
>Anderson's suggestion that both the PI and the element could be included
as a 
>reasonable way to cover all possibilities.  While I don't think the PI is 
>necessary, I can read that into the namespaces spec if I try hard enough.
(I 
>can read many possibilities into the spec.  This is fun!)
[... XSC namespace proposal snipped...]

I think you have done an excellent job given that none of us know where
XML-names is going to end up.

	P.

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 2 (Namespaces)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)
• Next by Date: Re: Attributes with Intent (and namespaces)
• Previous by thread: RE: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 2 (Namespaces)
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema validity (was: root element)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread