[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Piece-wise verification

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
• To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Jun 98 14:04:53 UT

[Forwarded for Peter Murray-Rust]
[Paul Prescod]
>Presume XSchema rules are similar to XSL rules, and are of the form:

[... XSL-like rule/pattern clipped ...]

 >Patterns would be very simple in the first version. (e.g. just the element
 >type name) Later versions could be aligned with XSL so that that code
 >could be reused. Constraints would also be simple and get more and more
 >advanced with subsequent versions.

I like this proposal. As Paul hints, we shouldn't attempt more than the
equivalent of a DTD in V1.0, and I suspect we might end up making the rule
optional (and thereby defaulting to the element). It strengthens the
XSL-like language as being useful for more than stylesheets [i.e. schemas,
and presumably transformations.] I suspect that it gives us a good deal of
the power we shall need 'for free'. For example if we want an element to
occur between 5 and 8 times the pattern could be:
descendant(5,FOO)     <!-- must be verfied -->
descendant(9,FOO)     <!-- must be falsified _->

The attraction of XSL-like language is that (presumably) there will be
engines to process it (and probably author it). And people will be familair
with in. [I built the rules bit of XSL into JUMBO1 so would be quite happy
to see it re-used for this purpose]. I assume that at this stage we may
simply want to give a meta-specification for the rule/pattern ("whatever
syntax is/comes_into force from the W3C"). I am assuming that although the
*output* of XSL is clearly very much up for grabs there is a good chance
that we are still retaining the rule/pattern bits.

	P.




Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: att="s&eacute;1"
• Next by Date: XSchema current status
• Previous by thread: Piece-wise verification
• Next by thread: XSchema current status
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread