|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Roots of the DTD
Peter> Peter Murray-Rust <URL:mailto:peter@u...> => In article <3.0.1.16.19980604224340.1cef3e16@p...>, => Peter wrote: Peter> At 17:27 04/06/98 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >> Hmmm. This sounds like the "root" (my syntax) or "RootElement" >> (Ron's syntax) attribute in XSchema is a Bad Thing. Perhaps it >> should be removed? Peter> Yup :-). I have not commented on the current proposals because Peter> I wanted them to anneal before public comment. *For describing Peter> a DTD*, here should be no requirement to define a <root> of any Peter> sort, only <element>, <attribute>, <contentSpec> and possibly Peter> <entity> and <notation> according to how people think. I can forsee applications where one might say, "Please send me documents conforming to the FOO schema," in much the same way as one requests LaTeX or Word formats these days. In which case, one usually needs also to specify the root element (this is implied in LaTeX or Word). I don't see any harm in the schema having a default root (on the understanding that documents may, if they wish, use a different root). It's not a big issue to me, though. -- xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








