[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: PCDATA vs CDATA

• From: "Tom Otvos" <tomo@e...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 15:53:29 -0400

Hmm, is that the only case where an XML parser might do the "wrong thing" if
it came across a document without a supporting DTD?  It seems to me that if
a document comes through without a DTD, and an element contained data not
explicitly escaped, then it would not be unreasonable to assume PCDATA and
try to parse it.  However, if a DTD is there to provide more info, then use
it.  I am not sure I see how it is significantly different than validating
that an element may, or may not, be a child of another element.

Tom Otvos
Director of Research, EveryWare Development Inc.
http://www.everyware.com/
"Try not! Do, or do not. There is no 'try'." - Yoda

-----Original Message-----
From: David G. Durand <david@d...>
To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>; Tom Otvos <tomo@e...>
Date: Tuesday, June 30, 1998 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: PCDATA vs CDATA


>Unmarked CDATA in an instance is not parseable without the element
declaration
>and without making all XML parsers read all DTDs to determine if CDATA
>might be found in any elements. This violates some of the design goals of
XML,
>and thus the decision was taken to eliminate CDATA content models.
>
>EMPTY has also been effectively trashed by XML's willingness to allow
<e></e>
>to represent an element <a> with an EMPTY content model.
>
>in both cases we pay a price (in convenience for CDATA and expressiveness
>for EMPTY), but we do get a system that will work well on the WWW in ways
that
>full SGML does not.
>
>  -- David
>
>------------------------------------------+----------------------------
>David Durand                 dgd@c...| david@d...
>Boston University Computer Science        | Dynamic Diagrams
>http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/  | http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
>                                          | MAPA: mapping for the WWW
>                                          |
http://dynamicDiagrams.com/minimapa
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: PCDATA vs CDATA
• Next by Date: Re: 'Optional' vs 'Implied' in XSchema
• Previous by thread: PCDATA vs CDATA
• Next by thread: Re: PCDATA vs CDATA
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread