|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: verbose XSchema Spec Section 2.4, Draft 2
Chris Maden: >This seems unnecessarily verbose in the extreme. >... >Here's where it gets interesting: Does XSchema have to limit itself to >the capabilities of DTDs? If so, why bother? Think about this: I like the proposal, and I don't mind using attributes. The concern I have is that processing XSchemas now requires a lot of extra checking on the 'correctness' of the XSchema. Using the elements, convoluted though it was, allowed the use of a simple validation (okay, it's ironic) to make sure that the XSchema wasn't attempting to provide an odd combination of functionality. Does this extra overhead for checking XSchemas bother anyone? The goals said that XSchema would have a DTD, not that an XSchema that can validate against the DTD would be functionally correct. (Or some such weirdness.) So far we've been using the DTD to constrain the XSchema's possible content. This would be a change of philosophy in that regard. Simon St.Laurent Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








