Re: Proposed Goals, Rev. 2
>I prefer to keep the word "document" buried in the acronym because in >discussions of SDD verification, it should be reserved to mean the >document being verified. Otherwise all confusion will break loose. Well, your reasons are understandable but XSD and SDD confuses me still. One of the things I did not like about DTD is that it is a document format different from XML documents. Seperating XSD and SDD fuels that confusion. However, my intent was to provide a comment in the spirit of communal dicussion. I have no hard stance nor commercial interest to protect so please move on if it makes no sense. >> 2. Some of the goals are actually benefits of using XML and redundant. > >Could you comment on which you think are redundant? XML documents are easy to parse, manipulate, etc. I believe goal #4 and some of the others state these as goals. >> 3. Relationship to DTD should be made more clear. > >I don' think that there is a clear relationship to be described, at this >point. The only thing we know is that there should be a well-defined >conversion from SDDs to DTDs. I just think it should be made clear whether XSD functional superset, equivalent or complement of DTD. Regards, Don Park xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format