RE: Name for XML DTDs
At 12:52 25/05/98 UT, Simon St.Laurent wrote: [...] >We'd probably better wrap up the name contributions soon and start deciding on >which of these names is the best. Then it'll be easier to identify what we're >talking about, and the real arguments can begin. > Agreed. You choose what we start with. If we all come to love it, fine. If we find that we redefine what it is we are creating - we'll need to rename it. It is often said that the title is the last part of the book to be written. I would suggest that you try to gather some *general* questions to start with, especially the limits we need to set ourselves. Since I think it's slightly less clear what we are trying to do here than in SAX it could be a good idea to iterate on the questions. I'd also suggest we set goals a la X*L processes, etc. 1. XSD (or whatever it is called) should be easy to use 2. XSD should be compatible with (?and algorithmically transformable into?) the equivalent DTD... and so on. P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format