Re: XML & SGML
Paul Prescod wrote: >... > But the fact that there is no separation does not imply that there > should not be no separate publications, newsgroups and mailing lists > for XML. Egad! I meant: "Even though there need be no separation between XML and other uses of SGML (they all live on a continuous complexity continuum), there could still be separate publications, newsgroups and mailing lists for XML." Re: Consortia: I'm not sure that XML consortia make sense. XML usage will soon be so diverse that I'm not sure that various "XML" companies would have much in common to discuss. It strikes me as somewhat like an "HTTP" consortia. SGML was already showing signs of that problem despite the community's emphasis on document processing. XML will have succeeded when people choose not to get together and talk about XML, but rather about XML-based OO protocols, XML-document processing, XML-knowledge representation and so forth. Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Perpetually obsolescing and thus losing all data and programs every 10 years (the current pattern) is no way to run an information economy or a civilization." - Stewart Brand, founder of the Whole Earth Catalog http://www.wired.com/news/news/culture/story/10124.html xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format