Re: XSchema Question 1: RDF
I would recommend that we stay clear of RDF for now for three reasons: First, RDF is a much more complex specification which is still being defined. Unless we can identify a simple and stable subset of RDF to base XSchema on, we will end up requiring all XSchema-compliant tools to be RDF-compliant as well. Second, we will be moving much faster than RDF effort and we need as much room as possible away from any large slow moving body like RDF. Three, I do not fully understand RDF. The spec starts off simple and elegant but ends up complicated and artificial. No offense to RDF WG. It usually happens when a concept is too useful. Regards, Don Park http://www.docuverse.com/personal/index.html xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format