RE: RFD: comp.text.xml
At 14:28 03/05/98 +0800, James K. Tauber wrote: > >A couple of points: > >1. The proposal of comp.text.xml in no way is to be taken as a negative >comment on xml-dev or any other mailing list. I love xml-dev. Thanks :-). I didn't take it as negative. I posted primarily because one posting could be read to give the wrong impression of the role of XML-DEV. Our intention (H+P) is that XML-DEV continue and if there are topics which are better suited to be on other fora we'll gently point that out. XML-DEV's role is clearly evolving and so our goals are deliberately simple 'a list for XML developers'. > >2. Discussion on the pros and cons of comp.text.xml should be held on the >news.groups newsgroup as stated in the RFD. Fully agreed. Any burgeoning discussion of c.t.x. will be gently pointed towards n.g P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format