RE: XSD: Proposed Goals, Rev. 3
> From: Simon St.Laurent > This will be one of the key questions asked in the next phase of the > discussion. I consider RDF one of the "W3C recommendations > regarding XML" and > don't think this needs to be stated explicitly. Others may feel > differently, > and I'd like to hear suggestions. I think the idea of proceding in clearly defined stages has more chance of working. The first stage should be element types to provide the equivalent of standard XML markup declarations. The second stage should provide the equivalent of standard SGML+ExtendedFacilities markup declarations ("&" connector, inclusions, data attributes, transparent element, value references). The third stage should be an extended content model system, suitable for RDF. The fourth stage should be a syntax to declare the syntax of PI values. The fifth stage should be to add whatever XML-data and RDF schema have that is not supported. In parallel to these should be the definition of standard notations for database types, which has been Tim Bray's pet project. If there are clearly defined stages then argument about one issue can be closed before the next is argued about. Rick Jelliffe xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format