[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Less verbose XML (Was: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bo

• From: Bryan Gilbert <Bryan_Gilbert@p...>
• To: "'XML-DEV'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 15:09:21 -0700

	From:	Steven DeRose [SMTP:sjd@e...] 
	Sent:	Friday, May 08, 1998 2:50 PM
	To:	xml-dev@i...
	Subject:	Re: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE:
SDD bogus)
	Sorry, but with Win98 rumored to demand 64MB of RAM just to run
and with
	Moore's Law applying to memory prices, I can't muster much
enthusiasm for
	an argument that it is too costly to shave bytes on markup. If
you had to

Work for a while in a system that has 1/2 MB ROM, 
maybe 1MB RAM, and a CPU that is managing 
intense calculations and I/O.

Am I alone?  Or are there others out there with similar
constraints who want to use XML?  I'd like to hear from
you.

Thanks

Bryan Gilbert, B.Sc.  M.Sc.
Systems Engineer, ION Modules Team,
Power Measurement Ltd 
2195 Keating Cros Road, Saanichton, BC, Can, V8M 2A5
Phone: (250) 652-7100 ext 7570
Fax: (250) 652-0411
email: (mailto:bryan_gilbert@p...)
WWW: (http://www.pml.com)


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Less verbose XML (Was: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus))
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)
• Next by Date: EBNF question
• Previous by thread: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)
• Next by thread: Re: Less verbose XML (Was: A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread