[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

XML & SGML

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 11:26:06 -0700

At 01:10 PM 5/6/98 -0500, W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
>>>> 
He also makes a clear distinction between use domains that require full strength SGML (and can therefore afford to implement its use) and use domains that do not.  This is a key message: 
XML->full SGML represents a continuum of cost/value that you can choose any point along.
<<<<
The only problem being that we lack the industrial experience
that would tell us at what point XML runs out of steam and you
need SGML extras.  I must say, that is one of the #1 	questions
I get at customer sites, and I just don't have a good answer
yet.  It's not easy; just because they're totally web-oriented
doesn't mean they don't need SGML, and just because they're
currently using the &-connector doesn't mean they couldn't
succeed with just XML. -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML & SGML
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Parents and children (was RFD: comp.text.xml)
• Next by Date: Re: XML & SGML
• Previous by thread: Re: Tim Bray on TechNetcast, Transcript Released
• Next by thread: Re: XML & SGML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread