Crossposting to XML-DEV and XML-L (was Re: Parents and children (was RFD
[crossposted to XML-L intentionally] At 15:45 03/05/98 -0400, Paul Prescod wrote: >I think that we could end this flamewar quite simply. XML is an SGML [...] > >Since there is no proposal, there is nothing to argue about and >argumentation is wasted breath. This discussion (?flame war?) is being carried on in duplicate on XML-L and XML-DEV. I believe it's a good thing to post only to a single list unless the posting is of *very* general value. (Automatic replies without reading the list of recipients is hardly ever a Good Thing.) I also suggest that on XML-DEV we favour discussions that seem to be leading to something concrete - whether software, resources, protocols or merely reshaping the future of the human race. In arguing for a new newsgroup it's worth making sure that the current organs fill different and non-overlapping roles. As I said I'm deliberately neutral. Relax... hack some SAX... P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format