please forgive the no-caps typing and brief reply. i have a baby in my other hand. several recent mails have read more into the namespaces proposal than is written in the paper, and have then argued against what the writer imagined the paper to say. i know it is easy to read a paper and to think that it implies all sorts of gigantic things. namespaces is a very simple, minimal thing. it isn't architectures. it isn't object orientation. it isn't a mechanism for document composition. it isn't a new way to write DTDs. it is only what the paper says: a means to associate a name with a controlled namespace. best wishes, andrew xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format