Re: SAX 1.0beta
John Wilson wrote: > > SAX should have a well defined convention for version numbering Agreed. > and this should be implemented in the JAR file manifest. That's perhaps not the best way, since it is so Java-specific. I've already proposed a different solution, which added two methods to SAX and two to the parser interface, but there were no responses (except one from David which never reached the list) and it hasn't appeared in SAX 1.0, so I guess that means it won't be in 1.0. --Lars M.  http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9803/0168.html (The proposal has some ParserFactory stuff as well, but that's really a separate issue. Also, the names are bad and should be changed.) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format