[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX needs from our point of view

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Michael Amster <mamster@w...>,xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:54:41 -0700

At 02:32 PM 4/23/98 -0700, Michael Amster wrote:

>		<![CDATA[
>			This is data with &references; which should not be parsed!
>		]]>
>			This is just text

>When this is reported up from a SAX parser, we do not differentiate between
>text and the CDATA, but let's say that we want to output the subset of
>arbitrary XML back out from our DOM or other object structure:

So, whenever you're going to output text into an XML document,
and that text contains < or &, then you have to escape it.
If you're going to output something and you *know* it's going
to contain neither child elements nor references, there's nothing
wrong with enclosing it in
<![CDATA[ .... ]]> 
just to be sure.

CDATA sections in SAX are nowhere near the 80-20 point.  Time to stop
talking and ship. -T.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Inheritance in XML
• Next by Date: Re: Inheritance in XML [^*]
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX needs from our point of view
• Next by thread: Re: Architectural Form
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread