[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Open Standards Processes

• From: Jon.Bosak@e... (Jon Bosak)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 14:00:07 -0700

[Matthew Gertner:]

| Your argument is convincing, but doesn't explain why open access is not
| given to works-in-progress for consultation by interested parties (i.e.
| read-only access).

Sorry I missed this earlier; there's a very simple answer.  The
specification work unavoidably reveals details about product plans.
That's why there are confidentiality restrictions.  Make access open
to everyone and the big companies won't play.  (Please don't tell me
why they should think differently or whether this position makes
sense.  I'm just reporting the facts.)

Jon



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Open Standards Processes
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>

• References:
  • Re: Open Standards Processes
    • From: matthew@p... (Matthew Gertner)

• Prev by Date: RE: Open Standards Processes
• Next by Date: Re: XML-DEVIL Proposal - was Open Standards Processes
• Previous by thread: Re: Open Standards Processes
• Next by thread: Re: Open Standards Processes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread