[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Namespaces, etc.

  • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • To: "w3c-xml-sig@w..." <w3c-xml-sig@w...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 10:28:38

At 03:51 04/02/98 -0500, [many people] wrote [about namespaces,
architectures, etc.]:

I don't want to stifle discussion on XML-DEV, but suggest some guidelines:

1. There is a public draft of the Namespaces paper now, I believe. [Could
someone please confirm this and give the location - I wouldn't like to
refer to a private document]. My understanding is that the W3C is actively
working on namespaces. For this reason I think it is appropriate that
proposals for other ways of developing namespaces (especially those which
require new syntax or semantics) be referred to the appropriate W3C body.
If you aren't a member, but have something to propose I would hope that
chairs will be sympathetic if you mail them.

A major problem with discussing current W3C activity on this list is that
most members/readers do not have up-to-date knowledge of the current W3C
discussions. This can make for confusion, and it would break
confidentiality for a W3C member to say "hang on, we are going down a
different line". The most reasonable thing to do is to discuss the last
public draft of a spec (especially its implementation or experience of
implementation :-) but NOT, IMO, to make suggestions for its revision.

2. I suggest that discussion is limited to *implementing* or *exploring*
the Namespace proposal. The XML spec refers (I think) to "namespace
experiments" and I think that this is the approach we should take - i.e.
discuss experiments with *this* namespace proposal. 

My own approach has been:
	- to create a private namespace experiment
	- to approach WG members to see if it broke confidentiality
	- to wait until the spec was public
	- to distribute it, and a short explanatory note, with the current JUMBO
release. (9801a1)

So, rather than discuss my very simple namespace experiment on this list
(since it has many demerits and will almost certainly be broken by future
namespace developments) you can get it and read it with the distribution.
Its sole merits are that it is actually implemented, works and does
something useful for my applications. If others see it as a way forward I'd
be interested.  I hope to release JUMBO-PLAY shortly and this will
optionally use the namespace proposal.


Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.