• From: "Michael J. Suzio" <msuzio@f...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 11:57:55 -0500

I think keeping the method with Public ID is fine, but if in
many cases we're just passing NULL as the first arg, why don't
we have a method which just accepts the system ID/URI?  I
myself have no use for Public ID, so I essentially always
just pass in NULL, which to me makes the code look confusing...

(I hate NULL/ignored parameters, especially as the first arg, I
usually rank args in order of "importance" to the method/procedure).

-- 
Michael J. Suzio
Web Technical Standards, WWW & Internet Applications
(313) 24-88120
msuzio@e... / msuzio@f...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: finalising org.sax.xml.Parser
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
  • Re: finalising org.sax.xml.Parser
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml:space
• Next by Date: Re: Binary Data
• Previous by thread: Re: finalising org.sax.xml.Parser
• Next by thread: Re: finalising org.sax.xml.Parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread