• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>,<xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 07:34:41 -0800

At 12:11 AM 07/02/98 -0800, Don Park wrote:
>Could you please elaborate on why there is no chance of BASE64 section
>proposal being accepted?

Simply put, we create standards following a set of formal rules, which is
strictly necessary if you are to have any hope of getting Netscape, Micrsoft,
Sun, et al, to go into a room and come out with a real result.  The rules
do not, at this point in time, leave room for the introduction of major
new features.

Having said that, I think that it would be a good idea for someone to
write up a proposal for the use of a reserved attribute or namespace to
signal, as a convention in XML 1.0, that the contents of an element are
base64 encoded.  This could be destined for XML 1.1 or perhaps serve
as a standalone recommendation layered on top of XML.

Nobody disputes that there is a real need in this area. -Tim



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: DOM for XML
• Next by Date: Re: Last minute request for BASE64 section support in XML 1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: Open Trading Protocol (CDATA, etc)(was BASE64 section support)
• Next by thread: Re: Last minute request for BASE64 section support in XML 1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread