Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
In message "Re: Namespaces, Architectural Forms, and Sub-Documents", Peter Murray-Rust wrote... > I hope that the "disgusting" refers to the use of 'img' and 'src' and the > implied semantics rather than the mechanism :-). I am an advocate of the > *mechanism* (e.g > http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms/talks/chemwebvei/020.html) where I > use XML-LINK explicitly to combine chemistry, maths and text. This has the > advantage that it avoids namespace problems. It also allows me to process > foreign files if certain assumptions are made. I think that your approach works. Do you think that this is the way to go? I.e., no namespace mechanisms but links only? Or, do you think that it should be possible to convert the link-based representation to the namespace-based representation and vice versa? Cheers, Makoto Fuji Xerox Information Systems Tel: +81-44-812-7230 Fax: +81-44-812-7231 E-mail: murata@a... xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
