[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: element content vs. element attribute

• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 11:36:00 -0500

Tad McClellan wrote:
> [ I hope I don't mispeak here. I haven't yet gotten my arms around all
>   the differences between XML and SGML. (That's why I am lurking here ;-)
> 
>   Someone please correct me if I have it wrong in an XML context
> ]

No, you are absolutely right. The original poster was a little confused
about CDATA. I meant to point that out but forgot. Thanks for doing so.

-- 
Paul Prescod -- http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Art is always at peril in universities, where there are so many people, 
young and old, who love art less than argument, and dote upon a text 
that provides the nutritious pemmican on which scholars love to chew. 
				-- Robertson Davies in "The Cunning Man"



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: element content vs. element attribute
    • From: Tad McClellan <tadmc@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: element content vs. element attribute
• Next by Date: Re: element content vs. element attribute
• Previous by thread: Re: element content vs. element attribute
• Next by thread: Re: element content vs. element attribute
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread