[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Message Length vs Processing Speed

• From: Henry Thompson <ht@c...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 08 Dec 1997 12:59:40 +0000

In the words of our former president, "We could do that, but it would
be wrong."  You SGML is impeccable, but without understanding why
people care about message length it's very hard to address the larger
issues you raise.  Could you elaborate a bit on the numbers and
attitudes involved, i.e. average message size now (is your example
typical?), anticipated traffic volume, size of archives, etc.?

ht
-- 
Henry S. Thompson, Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh
      2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
               Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...  
                      URL: http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Message Length vs Processing Speed
    • From: "Dolin,Robert H" <Robert.H.Dolin@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Seems it's all been worthwhile :)
• Next by Date: Re: MSXML 1.6 problem
• Previous by thread: Message Length vs Processing Speed
• Next by thread: Re: Message Length vs Processing Speed
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread