[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Classification: XML Parser Features

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 07:38:50 -0800

At 10:08 AM 12/12/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>Realm #1: Functionality
>
>a) Scanning
>     This type of parser simply skips the DOCTYPE declaration (using
>   regular expressions) and parses the markup in the document
>   instances.  

This is not a conformant XML processor per the spec.

There are certain things a processor is required to do with the internal
subset, including parse it and check it for syntax.

>b) DTD-driven

There are a whole range of behaviors.  Parsers may, not must, read 
external markup declarations and external parsed entities.  

>Realm #2: Validation
>
>a) Non-validating
>     This type of parser assumes that its input document is both
>   well-formed and valid, and is not required to report any errors at
>   all.

No such animal is envisioned in the standard.  If it doesn't check for
WF problems, it's not an XML processor.

I'll stop here.  I suggest you go back and re-work your (potentially helpful) 
list based on a re-reading of the specification. -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Classification: XML Parser Features
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: external dtd subset content
• Next by Date: Re: external dtd subset content
• Previous by thread: Java DOM ObjectBuilder
• Next by thread: Re: Classification: XML Parser Features
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread