[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: IDL?

• From: Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@m...>
• To: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 11:17:49 -0500

At 01:46 PM 12/28/97, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
>At 07:42 27/12/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
 
>>In other words, a DOM builder would be just another an event-based
>>SAX-J application.
 
>This suggests that implementers of the DOM (or other tree-related
>interfaces) will build on top of SAX-J. IFF you/we can persuade them of
>this, then great. If not, then there might be a tendency for SAX-J to
>atrophy after the DOM.
 
There will always be applications that prefer an event-based API, and they
may never want to or need to convert to a tree view. It would be nice to
have a standardized event-based API in addition to the standardized
tree-based API that the DOM provides...

Jonathan

 
 
jonathan@t...
Texcel Research
http://www.texcel.no

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>
  • RE: IDL?
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: IDL?
• Next by Date: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization
• Previous by thread: RE: IDL?
• Next by thread: RE: IDL?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread