Re: Problems with Entities (was re:Embed and validation)
why do inline declarations need an additional operator? what's wrong with allowing element - or, in a similar sense, entity declarations - to appear with their standard syntax? Rick Jelliffe wrote: > > From: Rob McDougall <RMcDouga@J...> > > > (1) Declarations must be performed near the top of the file. > > (2) Declarations should be performed near where they are used. > > There has been a proposal for inline declarations recently. They would > use declaration syntax but be inside a processing instruction, e.g. > <?IS8879 ELEMENT dog (nose, leg+, tail) ?> > > (This, I believe, will not be in WebSGML, now being finalized. But it > may make it through the big SGML revision which looms.) > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format