[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Entities and XPointers

• From: dgd@c... (David G. Durand)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 23:00:03 -0500 (EST)

At 12:26 AM -0000 12/3/97, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:

>I am probably missing something, but it seems fairly straightforward to
>extract something from another document - the question is whether it's
>allowed. For example,
>
><A HREF="foo.xml#DESCENDANT(3,CHAP)..DESCENDANT(4,CHAP)">
>or
><A HREF="foo.xml#DESCENDANT(3,CHAP)">

>could return a chunk of well-formed XML. (JUMBO is capable of the second
>form at present). The question is whether:

><!ENTITY chap3 "foo.xml#DESCENDANT(3,CHAP)">
>...
>&chap3;
>
>is legal in an XML parser.

Sure, it's a legal URL. However, an XML parser is not required to process
fragment IDs, so it's almost certainly a "broken link" in XML parsers that
don't implement XLL.

I think XLL will have to say whether this is supposed to work in XML
parsers that _do_ implement XLL. I would argue that they should (and that
since XLL should be widely implemented) that it will _eventually_ be
sensible to do. At the moment XLL is still soft enough that a hard and fast
judgement on this issue can't really be given, I think.

. I suspect that this is undefined - however it
>must not be 'application-dependent', because otherwise we get different
>parser behaviour.  (The use of other connectors (| and ?) is presumably
>similar - it's the mechanics of how the entity is retrieved.)

no, ? is always legal since it's processed at the server, by definition.
Whether it works (as will all URLs) depends on the server's policy for
reolving the URL's sent to it.

>The only argument I can see against this is that it requires all parser
>writers who cope with ENTITYs to resolve XLL - and that is quite a strong
>argument :-)

I think the evident usefulness of this is another strong argument for
implementing XLL widely, and also for making sure that XLL processors are
defined to affect URI (URL) throughout a document, and not just in XLL
specific elements.

  -- David

_________________________________________
David Durand              dgd@c...  \  david@d...
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://www.dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Entities and XPointers
    • From: dgd@c... (David G. Durand)
  • Re: Entities and XPointers
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: EMBED and validation
• Next by Date: Re: EMBED and validation
• Previous by thread: Re: Entities and XPointers
• Next by thread: XML for distributed processing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread