Re: SGML and XML
Rick Jelliffe wrote: > > Please say "XML is simpler than SGML '86" and "XML is better for small > systems than SGML '86" and "SGML has many things that are not needed" > but not "SGML people are trying to make everything complicated and make > XML as bad, complex, over-engineered and stinky as SGML". This demonizing > of "SGML people" is a bad way to win people over to XML. And as we have seen again and again, it will be the same arguments that the next person will use on XML and Simon's book. That's the way it's done. len bullard xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format