[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RMD: required versus optional parsing?

• From: Arjan Loeffen <Arjan.Loeffen@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 13:43:45 +0100

Dear reader,

should I interpret the RMD='NONE' to mean:

1) parsing the DTD is optional; no need to parse it in order to process
the instance

2) the DTD must not be parsed, as
      - the instance holds all information you need for a correct
interpretation
      - it may affect the interpretation of the instance
      - it may contain errors
      - it may not exists

Section 2.10 of the aug. 7, 1997 draft I have before doesn't make this
clear to me.

Related to this: does 'parsing' in this sense mean building up an
auxiliary information structure (DOM-like), or just determining the
validity of (syntax of) the declaration sets? cf.:

<?XML VERSION="1.0" RMD="NONE">
<!DOCTYPE ABC [hello]>
<ABC>...</ABC>

Should this 'parse'?

A reference to a previous XML discussion or any other explanatory text
is welcome.

Thanks in advance,
Arjan Loeffen

begin:          vcard
fn:             Arjan Loeffen
n:              Loeffen;Arjan
email;internet: arjan.loeffen@l...
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version:        2.1
end:            vcard

begin:          vcard
fn:             Arjan Loeffen
n:              Loeffen;Arjan
email;internet: arjan.loeffen@l...
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version:        2.1
end:            vcard

• Prev by Date: Re: conflicting answers
• Next by Date: Re: conflicting answers
• Previous by thread: attribute defaults
• Next by thread: Resources/Glossary Available?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread