Re: Must XML be SGML compatible? (Was: An incompatible CData idea)
Paul Prescod wrote: > > My argument for keeping XML a subset of SGML goes like this [snip] > The language that we use to encode humanity's knowledge should be a true > standard and not merely a "recommendation." That means that it should > be built upon our democratic institutions and not vendor consortiums. Well said, Paul. I suggest also, if we play this long enough, there won't be significant differences between SGML and XML *in common practice*. That's a goal that's easy to agree on but takes many hands at the table to achieve. First, demonstrably useful software. Version 1.0. len bullard xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format