[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Subclassing and Inheritance in generic documents

• From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@d...>
• To: "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 12:53:21 +0200

Paul Prescod wrote:
I believe that we need keywords and a parser-level understanding of
subclassing semantics.


[JS]  Agree. Drop the parameter entities and replace them with more "semantic" constructs, and then it will be much easier to write good DTD tools.
This would result in much better (at least many more) DTD tools, and many of them is likely to be free or at least very inexpensive.

Jarle Stabell


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Subclassing and Inheritance in generic documents
• Next by Date: Re: Subclassing and Inheritance in generic documents
• Previous by thread: Re: Subclassing and Inheritance in generic documents
• Next by thread: Re: Subclassing and Inheritance in generic documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread