In message <199709140826.JAA29099@a...> "Neil Bradley" writes: > > Reply-to: Arnaud Le Taillanter <arnaud21@c...> > > > Neil Bradley proposed some simple rules (this is "version 1", a second > > version, a little more complex, but simple enough, was proposed). I > > really like > > the approach, even if it doesn't work for the moment. > > I agree they are inadequate, but I think my second attempt was more > acurate than my first, so I am surprised that you now dissect the > first attempt. Still, I am happy to see this issue continue to be > aired. Any constructive discussion on this subject is appropriate for XML-DEV. As we have archives, it's important that posters read them beforehand, especially on this subject. [...] > > I am more than happy for people to pull-apart my proposed rules. That > is what I put them here for. But please refer to the second attempt, > not the first. Two procedural points (I am not commenting on the content): - the postings are all referenceable by URLs on Henry Rzepa's archive, so please use these if there is a chance of confusion. [David D] - please try to keep the same subject for the thread so that it can later be read in hypermailed form more easily. P. -- Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection Virtual School of Molecular Sciences http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format