[Jonathan Robie] > >Is there really an advantage to defining it in IDL first? The IDL could be >created after the specification is finished in Java, and the Java-based >specification is probably easier to create, understand, and test. I *like* >making things language independent, but at this stage, I'm leery of adding >complexity that doesn't add any new conceptual power. Hmmm. IDL == Language independent spec of an API....might this be better approached as an XML application? I.e. a DTD for the XML API spec. A doc conforming to that spec. that can be down-translated to Java, C++, Python and (gasp) IDL! APIs are stuctured docs. Let's practice what we are preaching and capture the API in XML. Unless there are compelling reasons why this does not make sense. Just thinking out loud and looking forward to a discussion on the issue. Sean xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format