[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re WF, V, and MSXML

• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:16:38 +0700

At 10:00 09/06/97 GMT, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:

>The possible options include at least:
>	- nsgmls-like.  Full validation is the only option.  Any non-valid
>		dcoument is flagged and appropriate error messages or error
>		action is initiated.  

The current version of nsgmls (the one in jade 0.8) supports a -wno-valid
which disables most validation.  With this option it doesn't complain about
undeclared element types and attributes.  However, 

- if you supply an attribute definition, then it will check that instances
of that attribute conform (it will of course continue parsing even if they
don't)

- if you declare a content model for an element type, then it will check
that the content of the element matches the content model, except that it
will not complain about the occurrence of any element types for which no
content model has been declared (again it will recover from errors of this
sort).

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Re WF, V, and MSXML
• Next by Date: Repeating attribute specifications
• Previous by thread: RE: Re WF, V, and MSXML
• Next by thread: RE: Re WF, V, and MSXML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread