[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Repeating attribute specifications

• From: Peter@u... (Peter Murray-Rust)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 18:53:21 GMT

In message <011290D45A8ACF119B8B00805FD471D60344E247@R...> David Schach writes:
> I think Tim misunderstood your question.  In the XML DTD, it is legal to
> have multiple AttistDecl's for a given element type (see section 3.3).
> This doesn't change the validity constraint of section 3.1.  Attributes
> in tags have to be unique.

I think I have misunderstood the answers as well :-)  I'd be grateful for a 
very simple explanation.

I assumed that the multiple attributes was so that if (say) 

<!ATTLIST FOO BAR CDATA "BAZ">

occurs in the external DTD and

<!ATTLIST FOO BAR CDATA "XYZZY">

occurs in the internal subset
then this is now legal whereas it wasn't before.  But what is now the default
value of BAR? I assumed it was the later declaration ("XYZZY").  Please
disabuse me if this is wrong.  [I assume that 

<FOO BAR="abc" BAR="xyz">

is illegal, still.  If not we have some software to rewrite.]

	P.


> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Richard Light [SMTP:richard@l...]
> > Sent:	Thursday, June 12, 1997 1:19 AM
> > To:	xml-dev@i...
> > Subject:	Re: Repeating attribute specifications
> > 
> > In message <3.0.32.19970611161725.00b540ac@p...>, Tim
> > Bray <tbray@t...> writes
> > >>Is there anything in the XML spec which corresponds to the SGML
> > >>stricture that "there can only be one attribute specification for
> > each
> > >>attribute definition", i.e. that you can't have repeated attribute
> > >>specifications within a single start-tag?  
> > >
> > >No.  This is legal in XML.  And in SGML, with the recent TC. -T.
> >  
> > The other answer I got to this question quoted the XML Lang spec
> > (section 3.1):
> > 
> > "Validity constraint - Unique Att Spec:
> > No attribute may appear more than once in the same start-tag."
> > 
> > This seemed to deal with the issue pretty conclusively: I had just
> > failed to look under "start-tags" while thinking about attributes ;-)
> > 
> > Is this all about to change with the 30 June update?
> > 
> > Richard Light
> > SGML and Museum Information Consultancy
> > richard@l...
> > 3 Midfields Walk 
> > Burgess Hill
> > West Sussex RH15 8JA
> > U.K.
> > tel. (44) 1444 232067
> > 
> > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
> > Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
> > To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
> > unsubscribe xml-dev
> > List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
> 
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
> To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
> unsubscribe xml-dev
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
> 
> 

-- 
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences
http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Repeating attribute specifications
    • From: Richard Light <richard@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Repeating attribute specifications
• Next by Date: RE: Repeating attribute specifications
• Previous by thread: RE: Repeating attribute specifications
• Next by thread: Re: Repeating attribute specifications
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread