Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Len Bullard <cbullard@h...> wrote: > Could we go through the bone of contention up front > and just settle it: are grove and grove plan definitions of > use to an object-oriented API design? Really just asking here, > so this gets settled and doesn't crop up again and again. I think so. It's very straightforward to translate class definitions from a grove plan into class definitions in (Java|C++|Modula-3|OO-language-of-choice). That's pretty much what James Clark did for the generic SP interface. That's a good approach for processing XML-as-XML. A slightly different approach is useful when you want to add application semantics, namely, to create a new class for each element type of interest, (or better yet, for each architectural form). That's sort of what SGMLS.pm, the original CoST, and (I think) Peter M-R's CML tools do. --Joe English jenglish@c... xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
