Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
>I am not convinced that it is really worth implimenting groves this way >though. Groves are designed such that it is often easier to duplicate >information, in a slightly different form, than to just reference it. >Sometimes you have to. Quite right. My implementation is actually different, though conceptually like the model I demonstrated. >When I was working on a general Grove interface I came to decide that >it really should be a grove specific set of classes which build on >some more primitive interfaces (such as node, property_value), and >which impliment properties as methods. Yes. Properties as methods is a much better idea. In my actual implementation, I basically export a map interface that allows properties to be set/get by name, and have various flavors of property. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
