• From: gtn@e... (Gavin Nicol)
• To: Peter@u...
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 10:45:38 -0500

>There are possibly two questions here.  Do we need to _pass the information_,
>and do we need to _have special names_ (rather than just Property).  I suspect
>that you will find it difficult to get rid of anything below that will
>satisfy everyone.  My own simple experience is that I would actively use
>the following:

OK. I think this is good arguments for actually defining these
classes, because people who want abstract groves can take these, and
build groves out of them.

>I would, however, be prepared to receive them as Property, so long as they
>were clearly documented, and I assume that they might well be subclassed
>from Property anyway.

Actually, from Node.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML API specification
    • From: Peter@u... (Peter Murray-Rust)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML API specification
• Next by Date: Re: XML API specification
• Previous by thread: Re: XML API specification
• Next by thread: Re: XML API specification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread