|
|
 next
|
  Subject: EDIFACT to XSD problem
Author: Tony Lavinio
Date: 04 Dec 2006 11:20 AM
|
>Hi!
>1. the "Use long element names" option flag (which is
>not documented as far as I know) doesn't seem to really
>affect the final XSD. That is, I get short names for segments
>(such as "BGM") but not for fields under it: for instance,
>in place of "BGM01-DocumentMessageName" I'd expect only "BGM01", and
>so on.
You're right; that seems to be broken. We'll get that fixed
right away. For some reason, it always seems to want to generate
the long names.
>2. I don't uderstand (I didn't find any documentation on this
>either) the difference between "batch" and "interactive"
>schema generation.
This is a property of the EDIFACT standard. EDIFACT messages
can use the 'batch' segments: UNB, UNH, UNT, UNZ, or the interactive
ones: UIB, UIH, UIT, UIZ. The latter are only available for syntax
level 4. See http://www.gefeg.com/jswg/v4/data/v4-9735-8.pdf
The use of these would depend on your producing or consuming
application.
|
|
|
|
top