XML Editor
Sign up for a WebBoard account Sign Up Keyword Search Search More Options... Options
Chat Rooms Chat Help Help News News Log in to WebBoard Log in Not Logged in
Show tree view Topic
Topic Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Go to previous topicPrev TopicGo to next topicNext Topic
Postnext
Alex GuarneriSubject: EDIFACT to XSD problem
Author: Alex Guarneri
Date: 04 Dec 2006 04:55 AM
Hi!
I am trying the EDIFACT to XSD wizard, which is perfetcly workin' except for a couple of things:
1. the "Use long element names" option flag (which is not documented as far as I know) doesn't seem to really affect the final XSD. That is, I get short names for segments (such as "BGM") but not for fields under it: for instance, in place of "BGM01-DocumentMessageName" I'd expect only "BGM01", and so on.
2. I don't uderstand (I didn't find any documentation on this either) the difference between "batch" and "interactive" schema generation.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,
Alex

Postnext
Tony LavinioSubject: EDIFACT to XSD problem
Author: Tony Lavinio
Date: 04 Dec 2006 11:20 AM
>Hi!
>1. the "Use long element names" option flag (which is
>not documented as far as I know) doesn't seem to really
>affect the final XSD. That is, I get short names for segments
>(such as "BGM") but not for fields under it: for instance,
>in place of "BGM01-DocumentMessageName" I'd expect only "BGM01", and
>so on.

You're right; that seems to be broken. We'll get that fixed
right away. For some reason, it always seems to want to generate
the long names.

>2. I don't uderstand (I didn't find any documentation on this
>either) the difference between "batch" and "interactive"
>schema generation.

This is a property of the EDIFACT standard. EDIFACT messages
can use the 'batch' segments: UNB, UNH, UNT, UNZ, or the interactive
ones: UIB, UIH, UIT, UIZ. The latter are only available for syntax
level 4. See http://www.gefeg.com/jswg/v4/data/v4-9735-8.pdf

The use of these would depend on your producing or consuming
application.

Posttop
Alex GuarneriSubject: EDIFACT to XSD problem
Author: Alex Guarneri
Date: 04 Dec 2006 11:57 AM
Thanks a lot, Tony.
So I'll wait for an update from your side regarding "long" or "short" element names.

Best Regards,

Alex

 
Topic Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Go to previous topicPrev TopicGo to next topicNext Topic
Download A Free Trial of Stylus Studio 6 XML Professional Edition Today! Powered by Stylus Studio, the world's leading XML IDE for XML, XSLT, XQuery, XML Schema, DTD, XPath, WSDL, XHTML, SQL/XML, and XML Mapping!  
go

Log In Options

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Stylus Scoop XML Newsletter:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2016 All Rights Reserved.