[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: adopting xepr tags and concept in to xsl, xQuery,

Subject: Re: adopting xepr tags and concept in to xsl, xQuery, and XForms
From: "L2L 2L emanuelallen@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:40:39 -0000
Re:  adopting xepr tags and concept in to xsl
Thanks for the resource. To give more a structure familiarity programming
view. Making it it's on language, but also as a implantation language to be
use in either xml language that provide functionalities.


Plus I'm interested in Xqib( xQuery in the broswer), and furthering it as a
programming language:

http://www.xqib.org/

http://archive.xmlprague.cz/2011/presentations/xqib.pdf

https://websci.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/teaching/ws201112/xmldb/sheets/xqib
-documentation.pdf

http://cs.brown.edu/~kraskat/pub/www09-xqib.pdf

 I have more resource if this struck your interest.

All in all, I just feel this would be a great add on.

E-S4L

> On Jul 29, 2014, at 6:45 AM, "Abel Braaksma (Exselt) abel@xxxxxxxxxx"
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Have a look at open-eXtend, the only project I could find that implemented
XTND, and had an intention to also implement XEPR. However, it looks like it
is not very active anymore, with the codebase being from 2004, I couldn't
readily find out how far they have gotten.
>
> Apparently, XEPR should be considered as a meta-language, as briefly
explained here: http://www.stylusstudio.com/xmldev/200102/post60610.html. But
I do not know enough (if anything) of it to understand its width or depth or
how it compares to existing XML-based languages.
>
> It was sent in as a Note and has been considered by the W3C, see
http://www.w3.org/Submission/2000/10/Comment. Apparently, even though it was
considered, I can't find any reference whether any of its features or findings
have made it into existing specs. In the archives of the public and some
non-public mailing lists from W3C I could find little to no references to it.
>
> I'm curious why you think that, after 14 years (the W3C Note, not from W3C
themselves, is from October 2000), it would (still, again?) make sense to
consider it for already very mature languages such as XSLT or XForms.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Abel Braaksma
> Exselt XSLT 3.0 streaming processor
> http://exselt.net
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: L2L 2L emanuelallen@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xsl-list-
>> service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 7:51 PM
>> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject:  adopting xepr tags and concept in to xsl, xQuery, and
XForms
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xexpr/
>>
>> Briefing looking over this w3c request; i feel that this already exist, and
it's call
>> xsl.
>>
>> But a lot of these tags could be consider as add on in both xsl and xQuery
for
>> farther control, and manipulation over the XML elements and or contents.
>>
>> Please take this in consideration.
>>
>> Also this could be of help to XForms processing.
>>
>> Please take this into consideration.
>>
>> Thank you for taking the time to read this.
>>
>> E-S4L

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.