[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT Unit Testing and Coverage

Subject: Re: XSLT Unit Testing and Coverage
From: "Tony Graham tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 19:12:47 -0000
Re:  XSLT Unit Testing and Coverage
On Wed, May 28, 2014 7:58 pm, Vasudev Kandhadai vasu.kandhadai@xxxxxxxxx
> is there a good reason to deploy a XSLT unit testing framework? I have

If it's going to be useful to you.

> never seen any serious XSLT dev env where the XSLT unit testing was either
> done religiously, or considered mandatory.  Other than a very religious
> Java development team with strict Junit set up with Maven etc, who have
> adopted XSLT into their dev env, who would now want to extend the same
> ideologies to the XSLT world?  I have personally never used or utilized
> practically any XSLT unit testing framework in any project and nor was
> there any requirement to do so...

Then don't.

I find it most useful with code involving regular expressions -- e.g.,
recognising part numbers in text -- since there can be a lot of variation
in the source and since the regular expressions are often built up from
multiple sub-expressions.

> So considering we need to do this, I came across,
> XSPEC, XUnit etc.. Xspec seems like a good one,  but doesnt look like a
> lot
> of discussions are  happening in the community.. The Coverage feature

Which can mean that it works well enough for multiple people.

> doesnt work ...
> The class is not being maintained.

That much is true.

> Cakupan, was very hard on my brains to read the manual.. Again something
> that has been out there for a while and not sure it is still maintained /
> supported.

Why does code have to be constantly churning to be seen to be useful,
particularly when it's just a utility?

> Does anyone has any ideas on what options we have in the XML world for
> XSL Unit Testing + Coverage Report

My page on testing XSLT is at

> I tried posting to the Xspec community but no one bothered to answer my
> questions , so I am inclined to think it is dead.

Sorry, but I, for one, haven't seen anything from you on the XSpec mailing
list [1].  Could it be stuck in moderation?

> Somehow I am also inclined to think Coverage feature is a very
> Java/C#/C/C++ paradigm... Doesnt make too much sense with the XSLT world?

If you're going for 100% test coverage, then yes; otherwise, it depends.


Tony Graham                                         tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx
Consultant                                       http://www.mentea.net
Chair, Print and Page Layout Community Group @ W3C    XML Guild member
  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --
Mentea       XML, XSL-FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming

[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/xspec-users

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.