Re: set union? xslt 2.0

Play the video

Subject: Re: set union? xslt 2.0
From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:47:12 +0100

On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:14:14 +0100
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip/>

Thanks for the longer explanation David.

All now working.

Quotable quote?
"It's fairly natural to have implicit quantification since the basic
type  in xpath is a set 9xpat 10 or sequence (xpath 2) rather than
singltons."

I'm sure I could work that out if my keyboard had anything
engraved on the keycaps.




- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Current Thread

Re: set union? xslt 2.0, (continued)
- Andrew Welch - 8 Apr 2010 09:33:57 -0000
  - Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 09:43:48 -0000
    - Andrew Welch - 8 Apr 2010 10:09:04 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: set union? xslt 2.0, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: set union? xslt 2.0, David Carlisle
Re: set union? xslt 2.0, David Carlisle	Date	problem with processing CDATA, Robby Pelssers
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >