[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each

Subject: Re: Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each ?
From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:02:06 +0000
Re:  Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each
2009/12/7 Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Andrew Welch said:
>> Push is simply where the document order drives the processing... not
>> sure where modes or namespaces come into it.
> Pull is when you know  exactly which template will be selected for
> processing -- the order of processing is not important at all (because
> as we know in an FP language order is not guaranteed (except when we
> take particular measures, such as using monad-like programming) at all
> -- so even with pull processing we have no guarantees about the order
> of processing. Note that other FP languages do not have the topic of
> push/pull -- this is exactly because they dont have the possibility of
> numerous matching templates.

I think you are confusing the node list with the processing order -
its how the node list is constructed that is push vs pull, it can be
processed in any order as you know, but must be output in the same
order as that node list.

Andrew Welch
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.