[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each

Subject: Re: Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each ?
From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:18:55 +0530
Re:  Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> B The first difference that come to my mind is that the sequence ctor of a
function is always evaluated in temporary output state.

That's correct I think. The sequence constructor of xsl:function just
computes what to return from the function. The function returns, a
sequence finally (I think, generically any XDM primitive).

Whereas instructions in body of, xsl:call-template actually
contributes to the output of the template (call-template!).

Mukul Gandhi

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.